Lawyer course – Trey Riley Law http://treyrileylaw.com/ Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:22:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 https://treyrileylaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/icon-2021-07-01T184802.035.png Lawyer course – Trey Riley Law http://treyrileylaw.com/ 32 32 Weinstein extradition fight ends with transfer to California https://treyrileylaw.com/weinstein-extradition-fight-ends-with-transfer-to-california/ https://treyrileylaw.com/weinstein-extradition-fight-ends-with-transfer-to-california/#respond Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:34:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/weinstein-extradition-fight-ends-with-transfer-to-california/ BUFFALO, NY (AP) – New York prison officials on Tuesday handed over convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein to be transported to California to face additional sexual assault charges, ending the fight extension of the former film producer to delay his extradition. Weinstein, 69, was released by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision […]]]>

BUFFALO, NY (AP) – New York prison officials on Tuesday handed over convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein to be transported to California to face additional sexual assault charges, ending the fight extension of the former film producer to delay his extradition.

Weinstein, 69, was released by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision at around 9:25 a.m., according to a department statement.

His spokesman, Judah Engelmayer, said Weinstein’s lawyers were still trying to negotiate an extradition waiver, but the transfer was expected “at some point.”

“We will fight so that Harvey can receive the medical care he needs and of course, so that he can be treated fairly,” Engelmayer said. “Due process, the presumption of innocence and a fair trial are always his right. “

Details of Weinstein’s travels were not immediately known.

A New York judge approved Weinstein’s extradition to California in June, rejecting his lawyers’ request to keep him in state prison near Buffalo – where he is serving a 23-year sentence on a rape conviction last year – until the start of the jury selection in the case of Los Angeles.

Weinstein’s attorney, Norman Effman, argued he should remain in the hospital-like maximum security facility in Wende while receiving treatment for illnesses, including vision loss.

Weinstein was indicted in January 2020 with 11 counts of sexual assault in California involving five women, resulting from alleged assaults in Los Angeles and Beverly Hills from 2004 to 2013. The charges include rape, forced oral copulation, sexual violence by coercion and sexual penetration by use of force.

Weinstein claims his innocence and maintains that all sexual activity was consensual.

The California charges were announced shortly before Weinstein’s conviction in New York City for raping an aspiring actress in 2013 in a Manhattan hotel room and forcibly performing oral sex on a television and film production assistant in 2006 in his Manhattan apartment.

He is appealing against this conviction.

A lawyer for one of Weinstein’s accusers applauded Tuesday’s transfer, which has been repeatedly delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic as well as legal arguments over the paperwork and his medical needs.

“The opportunity to hold Weinstein accountable for his actions in California gives a voice to survivors, including my client, Jane Doe 4,” lawyer Elizabeth Fegan said in a statement. “They deserve to be heard and for Weinstein to be held accountable for his actions. Our hope is that a guilty verdict in California will ensure that Harvey Weinstein will spend the rest of his life behind bars, ensuring justice for women everywhere. “

___

Associated Press writer Michael Sisak in New York contributed to this report.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/weinstein-extradition-fight-ends-with-transfer-to-california/feed/ 0
SHAREHOLDER ACTION ALERT: Law firm Schall reminds investors of class action lawsuit against Stable Road Acquisition Corp. and encourages investors with losses greater than $ 100,000 to contact the firm https://treyrileylaw.com/shareholder-action-alert-law-firm-schall-reminds-investors-of-class-action-lawsuit-against-stable-road-acquisition-corp-and-encourages-investors-with-losses-greater-than-100000-to-contact-the-fi/ https://treyrileylaw.com/shareholder-action-alert-law-firm-schall-reminds-investors-of-class-action-lawsuit-against-stable-road-acquisition-corp-and-encourages-investors-with-losses-greater-than-100000-to-contact-the-fi/#respond Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:12:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/shareholder-action-alert-law-firm-schall-reminds-investors-of-class-action-lawsuit-against-stable-road-acquisition-corp-and-encourages-investors-with-losses-greater-than-100000-to-contact-the-fi/ LOS ANGELES–(COMMERCIAL THREAD) – Law firm Schall, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of class action lawsuit against Stable Road Acquisition Corp. (“Stable Road” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: SRAC) for violations of §§10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and of rule 10b-5 enacted under that here by […]]]>

LOS ANGELES–(COMMERCIAL THREAD) – Law firm Schall, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of class action lawsuit against Stable Road Acquisition Corp. (“Stable Road” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: SRAC) for violations of §§10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and of rule 10b-5 enacted under that here by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between October 7, 2020 and July 13, 2021 inclusive (the “Recourse Period”), are encouraged to contact the Company before September 13, 2021.

If you are a shareholder who has suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by legal counsel. If you choose to do nothing, you can remain an absent member of the group. Stable Road’s merger goal Momentus held a test of its key technology in 2019 that fell short of its criteria for success. The United States government viewed Momentus CEO Mikhail Kokorich as a threat to national security, jeopardizing the company’s potential business success. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and misleading throughout the Class Period. When the market learned the truth about Stable Road, investors suffered damage.

According to the complaint, the company made false and misleading statements to the market.

Join the case to recoup your losses.

Schall law firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class actions and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered an attorney’s advertisement in certain jurisdictions under applicable law and rules of professional conduct.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/shareholder-action-alert-law-firm-schall-reminds-investors-of-class-action-lawsuit-against-stable-road-acquisition-corp-and-encourages-investors-with-losses-greater-than-100000-to-contact-the-fi/feed/ 0
INVESTOR ALERT: Howard G. Smith Law Firms Announce Securities Class Action Filing on Behalf of CarLotz, Inc. (LOTZ) Investors https://treyrileylaw.com/investor-alert-howard-g-smith-law-firms-announce-securities-class-action-filing-on-behalf-of-carlotz-inc-lotz-investors/ https://treyrileylaw.com/investor-alert-howard-g-smith-law-firms-announce-securities-class-action-filing-on-behalf-of-carlotz-inc-lotz-investors/#respond Fri, 09 Jul 2021 17:18:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/investor-alert-howard-g-smith-law-firms-announce-securities-class-action-filing-on-behalf-of-carlotz-inc-lotz-investors/ BENSALEM, PA – (COMMERCIAL THREAD) – The law firm of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who have purchased securities of CarLotz, Inc. (“CarLotz” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: LOTZ ) Between December 30, 2020 and May 25, 2021, inclusive (the “Class Period”). CarLotz investors have […]]]>

BENSALEM, PA – (COMMERCIAL THREAD) – The law firm of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who have purchased securities of CarLotz, Inc. (“CarLotz” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: LOTZ ) Between December 30, 2020 and May 25, 2021, inclusive (the “Class Period”). CarLotz investors have up to September 7, 2021 file an application as the principal applicant.

Investors experiencing losses on their CarLotz investments are encouraged to contact the law firms of Howard G. Smith to discuss their legal rights in this class action lawsuit at 888-638-4847 or by email at howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com.

On March 15, 2021, CarLotz announced its fourth quarter and full year 2020 financial results. During a related conference call, the company stated that the gross margin and gross margin per unit (“GPU”) “ were less than. . . expected “due to” the increase in inventory during the quarter and the resulting drop in profitability of retail units. “CarLotz also reported that the additional inventory” created a bottleneck which resulted in slower processing and longer selling days ”.

Following this news, the company’s stock price fell $ 0.79, or 8.5%, to close at $ 8.45 per share on March 16, 2021, on unusually high trading volume. The stock price continued to decline over the next two consecutive trading days by $ 0.62, or 7.3%, to close at $ 7.83 per share on March 18, 2021, on trading volume unusually high.

Then, on May 10, 2021, after the market closed, CarLotz announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2021 revealing that the gross margin per unit was below expectations. In particular, the company expected the retail GPU to be between $ 1,300 and $ 1,500, but said $ 1,182.

Following this news, the company’s stock price fell $ 0.94, or 14%, to close at $ 5.57 per share on May 11, 2021, on unusually high trading volume. The stock price continued to decline $ 0.45, or 8%, to close at $ 4.12 per share on May 12, 2021, on unusually high trading volume.

Then, on May 26, 2021, ahead of the market opening, CarLotz announced an update to its profit-sharing sourcing partnership agreement. Specifically, CarLotz stated that its “Profit Sharing Company Vehicle Supply Partner has advised the Company that, in light of the current wholesale market conditions, it has suspended shipments to the Company”. Additionally, this partner “accounted for over 60% of cars sold and sourced” in the first quarter of 2021 and “less than 50% of cars sold and around 25% of cars sourced” during the second quarter of 2021 to date.

Following this news, the Company’s share price fell $ 0.70, or 13.4%, to close at $ 4.51 per share on May 26, 2021, on unusually high trading volume.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, the Defendants made materially false and / or misleading statements, and failed to disclose material adverse facts regarding the business, operations and prospects of the society. Specifically, the Defendants made false statements regarding the following: (1) that due to an increase in inventory in the second half of fiscal 2020, CarLotz was experiencing a “traffic jam” resulting in slower processing and longer selling days; (2) that as a consequence, the gross profit per unit of the Company would be adversely affected; (3) that in order to minimize returns to the corporate vehicle supply partner responsible for more than 60% of CarLotz’s inventory, the Company was offering aggressive pricing; (4) that, as a result, CarLotz’s expected gross profit per unit was likely inflated; (5) that this company’s corporate vehicle supply partner would likely suspend shipments to the company due to market conditions, including increased wholesale prices; and (6) as a result, the Defendants’ statements regarding its business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and / or lacked reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you have purchased CarLotz securities, have any information or would like to learn more about any such claims, or have any questions regarding this announcement or your rights or interests in any such matters, please contact Howard G. Smith, Esquire, of Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pa. 19020, by phone at (215) 638-4847, toll free at (888) 638-4847, or by email at howardsmith @ howardsmithlaw. com, or visit our website at www.howardsmithlaw.com.

This press release may be considered an attorney’s advertisement in certain jurisdictions under applicable law and ethical rules.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/investor-alert-howard-g-smith-law-firms-announce-securities-class-action-filing-on-behalf-of-carlotz-inc-lotz-investors/feed/ 0
Vincent Wong Law Firms Notify Investors of Class Action Involving Churchill Capital Corp IV https://treyrileylaw.com/vincent-wong-law-firms-notify-investors-of-class-action-involving-churchill-capital-corp-iv/ https://treyrileylaw.com/vincent-wong-law-firms-notify-investors-of-class-action-involving-churchill-capital-corp-iv/#respond Thu, 01 Jul 2021 23:55:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/vincent-wong-law-firms-notify-investors-of-class-action-involving-churchill-capital-corp-iv/ New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – July 1, 2021) – Law firms of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who bought Churchill Capital Corp IV (“Churchill Capital” ) (NYSE: CCIV) between January 11, 2021 and February 22, 2021. If you have suffered a claim, […]]]>

New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – July 1, 2021) – Law firms of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who bought Churchill Capital Corp IV (“Churchill Capital” ) (NYSE: CCIV) between January 11, 2021 and February 22, 2021.

If you have suffered a claim, contact us via the link below. There is no cost or obligation for you.
http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/churchill-capital-corp-iv-loss-submission-form?prid=17337&wire=5

Allegations against CCIV include that the Company made materially false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (1) Lucid was not ready to deliver vehicles by spring 2021; (2) Lucid forecast production of 557 vehicles in 2021 instead of the 6,000 vehicles announced as the merger with Churchill approaches; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, the Defendants’ positive statements regarding the business, operations and prospects of the Company were materially misleading and / or lacked reasonable basis. When the real details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors have suffered damage.

If you suffered a loss in Churchill Capital, you have up to August 30, 2021 request that the Court appoint you as the principal plaintiff. Your ability to participate in any recovery does not require you to serve as the principal applicant.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced lawyer who has represented investors in securities litigation involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Lawyer advertising. Past results do not guarantee similar results.

CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 Broadway East
Office 304
New York, New York 10002
Phone. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
Email: vw@wongesq.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/89271


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/vincent-wong-law-firms-notify-investors-of-class-action-involving-churchill-capital-corp-iv/feed/ 0
New law makes driver training compulsory for Georgia’s 17-year-olds to obtain licenses – WSB-TV Channel 2 https://treyrileylaw.com/new-law-makes-driver-training-compulsory-for-georgias-17-year-olds-to-obtain-licenses-wsb-tv-channel-2/ https://treyrileylaw.com/new-law-makes-driver-training-compulsory-for-georgias-17-year-olds-to-obtain-licenses-wsb-tv-channel-2/#respond Thu, 01 Jul 2021 09:21:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/new-law-makes-driver-training-compulsory-for-georgias-17-year-olds-to-obtain-licenses-wsb-tv-channel-2/ Georgian teenagers who will soon get behind the wheel will need to be informed of a new law that comes into force on Thursday. As of July 1, “Joshua’s Law” will require 16 and 17 year olds to take a safety course before they can get their license. Joshua’s Law, also known as House Bill […]]]>

Georgian teenagers who will soon get behind the wheel will need to be informed of a new law that comes into force on Thursday.

As of July 1, “Joshua’s Law” will require 16 and 17 year olds to take a safety course before they can get their license.

Joshua’s Law, also known as House Bill 466, was passed during this year’s legislative session. Currently, 17-year-olds are exempted from the 30 hours of instruction in the program and the six hours of driver training.

TRENDING STORIES:

The Georgia Department of Driver Services has stated that anyone under the age of 18 will not receive their initial Class D license without completing the required training.

There are several options for teens to complete the program, including:

  • 30 hours of classroom instruction at a DDS approved school plus six hours of driving training at a DDS approved school plus 40 hours of supervised driving with a parent / guardian
  • 30 hours of classroom instruction at a DDS approved school and completion of the Teen Parent Driving Guide which includes 40 hours of supervised driving with a parent / guardian
  • Online course from a DDS approved school plus six hours of driving training at a DDS approved school plus 40 hours of supervised driving with a parent / guardian
  • DDS Approved Online Course and Teen Parent Driving Guide Completion which includes 40 hours of supervised driving with a parent / guardian

Teens are not required to present a driving log for supervised hours, but a parent or guardian must be present when applying for a license.

The DDS says approved courses are offered by high schools and private driving schools that can cost around $ 250. There are approved online virtual programs offered at lower cost.

A list of accredited schools is available on the DDS website.

[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/new-law-makes-driver-training-compulsory-for-georgias-17-year-olds-to-obtain-licenses-wsb-tv-channel-2/feed/ 0