Law practice – Trey Riley Law http://treyrileylaw.com/ Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:24:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://treyrileylaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/icon-2021-07-01T184802.035.png Law practice – Trey Riley Law http://treyrileylaw.com/ 32 32 LEADING LAW FIRM ROSEN encourages Koninklijke Philips https://treyrileylaw.com/leading-law-firm-rosen-encourages-koninklijke-philips/ https://treyrileylaw.com/leading-law-firm-rosen-encourages-koninklijke-philips/#respond Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:00:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/leading-law-firm-rosen-encourages-koninklijke-philips/ NEW YORK, August 27, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds buyers of securities of Koninklijke Philips NV (NYSE: PHG) between February 25, 2020 and June 11, 2021 inclusive (the “Class Period”) , from October 15, 2021, lead applicant deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Philips Securities […]]]>

NEW YORK, August 27, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds buyers of securities of Koninklijke Philips NV (NYSE: PHG) between February 25, 2020 and June 11, 2021 inclusive (the “Class Period”) , from October 15, 2021, lead applicant deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Philips Securities during the Class Period, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of out-of-pocket expenses or fees under a contingency fee agreement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Philips class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2147.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class action has already been filed. If you wish to act as the principal applicant, you must apply to the Court no later than October 15, 2021. A principal plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of the other members of the class to direct the litigation.

WHY THE ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified advisors with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, companies issuing opinions do not have significant experience, resources or recognition by their peers. Be wise in choosing the right lawyer. Rosen law firm represents investors around the world, focusing its practice on class actions in securities and derivative litigation between shareholders. Rosen law firm has secured the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. Rosen law firm was ranked # 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 every year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone, the company raised more than $ 438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was appointed by law360 as the Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s lawyers have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

CASE DETAILS: According to the lawsuit, the defendants throughout the Class Period made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had deficient product manufacturing controls or procedures; (2) as a result, the Company’s two-level positive pressure (“two-level PAP”) and continuous positive pressure (“CPAP”) devices and mechanical ventilators were manufactured using hazardous materials; (3) as a result, the Company’s sales revenues from the aforementioned products were unsustainable; (4) the above has also subjected the Company to a substantial risk of product recall, in addition to possible legal and / or regulatory action; and (5) accordingly, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all material times. When the real details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors have suffered damage.

To join the Philips class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2147.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No class has been certified. Until a group is certified, you are not represented by a lawyer unless you hire one. You can choose the lawyer of your choice. You can also remain an absent group member and do nothing at this point. The ability of an investor to participate in any potential future payback does not depend on whether he is a principal applicant.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Lawyer advertising. Previous results do not guarantee a similar result.

——————————-

Contact details:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Rosen Law Firm, Pennsylvania
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone. : (212) 686-1060
Toll free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cas@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com



Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/leading-law-firm-rosen-encourages-koninklijke-philips/feed/ 0
Rosen, a Leading Law Firm, Encourages Zymergen Inc. Investors with Losses Over $ 100,000 to Obtain a Lawyer Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-a-leading-law-firm-encourages-zymergen-inc-investors-with-losses-over-100000-to-obtain-a-lawyer-before-important-deadline-in-securities-class-action/ https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-a-leading-law-firm-encourages-zymergen-inc-investors-with-losses-over-100000-to-obtain-a-lawyer-before-important-deadline-in-securities-class-action/#respond Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:28:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-a-leading-law-firm-encourages-zymergen-inc-investors-with-losses-over-100000-to-obtain-a-lawyer-before-important-deadline-in-securities-class-action/ New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – August 24, 2021) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds buyers of securities of Zymergen Inc. (NASDAQ: ZY) in accordance with and / or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Zymergen’s initial […]]]>

New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – August 24, 2021) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds buyers of securities of Zymergen Inc. (NASDAQ: ZY) in accordance with and / or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Zymergen’s initial public offering in April 2021 (the “Initial Public Offering”), the material Principal applicant deadline of October 4, 2021.

SO WHAT: If you have purchased Zymergen securities in accordance with and / or traceable to the registration statement, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any fees or additional charges through a contingency fee agreement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Zymergen class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2141.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class action has already been filed. If you want to serve as the principal applicant, you must move the court no later than October 4, 2021. A principal plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of the other members of the class to direct the litigation.

WHY THE ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified advisors with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, companies issuing opinions do not have significant experience, resources or recognition by their peers. Be wise in choosing the right lawyer. Rosen law firm represents investors around the world, focusing its practice on class actions in securities and derivative litigation between shareholders. Rosen law firm has secured the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. Rosen law firm was ranked # 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 every year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone, the company raised more than $ 438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was appointed by law360 as the Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s lawyers have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

CASE DETAILS: According to the lawsuit, the registration statement contained false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (1) during the qualification process for Hyaline, key customers encountered technical issues, including product reduction and incompatibility with customer processes; (2) although the qualification process was essential to gain market acceptance for Hyaline and generate revenue, Zymergen lacked visibility into the qualification process; (3) as a result, Zymergen overestimated the demand for its products; (4) due to the foregoing, the delivery schedule of Zymergen’s products was reasonably likely to be delayed, which in turn would delay revenue generation; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, the defendants’ positive statements about Zymergen’s business, operations and prospects were substantially misleading and / or lacked reasonable basis. When the real details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors have suffered damage.

To join the Zymergen class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2141.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No class has been certified. Until a group is certified, you are not represented by a lawyer unless you hire one. You can choose the lawyer of your choice. You can also remain an absent group member and do nothing at this point. The ability of an investor to participate in any potential future payback does not depend on whether he is a principal applicant.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Lawyer advertising. Previous results do not guarantee a similar result.

——————————-

Contact details:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Rosen Law Firm, Pennsylvania
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone. : (212) 686-1060
Toll free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cas@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/94304



Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-a-leading-law-firm-encourages-zymergen-inc-investors-with-losses-over-100000-to-obtain-a-lawyer-before-important-deadline-in-securities-class-action/feed/ 0
Texas Increases Protection for Employees Filing Sexual Harassment Complaints https://treyrileylaw.com/texas-increases-protection-for-employees-filing-sexual-harassment-complaints/ https://treyrileylaw.com/texas-increases-protection-for-employees-filing-sexual-harassment-complaints/#respond Tue, 24 Aug 2021 03:00:26 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/texas-increases-protection-for-employees-filing-sexual-harassment-complaints/ Texas Governor Greg Abbott recently signed two new bills (Senate Bill 45 and House Bill 21) that strengthen protection for all employees who make allegations of sexual harassment under Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code (Chapter 21). Both laws will come into force on September 1. With the passage of these new laws, Texas […]]]>

Texas Governor Greg Abbott recently signed two new bills (Senate Bill 45 and House Bill 21) that strengthen protection for all employees who make allegations of sexual harassment under Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code (Chapter 21). Both laws will come into force on September 1. With the passage of these new laws, Texas employers can expect significant changes related to sexual harassment complaints, including a broader definition of who is considered an “employer,” a stronger standard for employers. responding to internal complaints of sexual harassment; and extending the statute of limitations to file with the state agency.

Who is considered an “employer? “

Prior to the passage of Senate Bill 45, to be considered an employer under Chapter 21, a business had to have 15 or more employees and only the entity could be held responsible. However, Senate Bill 45 expands the definition of an employer to include any person or entity that employs one or more employees, or “acts directly in the interest of an employer vis-à-vis an employee”. By expanding the definition, companies or individuals who employ even one employee as well as individual supervisors can be held liable for allegations of sexual harassment. Prior to this change, small businesses and malicious individuals could escape liability for sexual harassment lawsuits by arguing that they did not meet the definition of “employer”. With this change, this defense will no longer be available.

How should an employer respond to an internal sexual harassment complaint?


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/texas-increases-protection-for-employees-filing-sexual-harassment-complaints/feed/ 0
Rosen, National Trial Lawyers, Encourages Lossy Yalla Group Limited Investors to Obtain Legal Counsel Before Important Securities Class Action Deadline https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-national-trial-lawyers-encourages-lossy-yalla-group-limited-investors-to-obtain-legal-counsel-before-important-securities-class-action-deadline/ https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-national-trial-lawyers-encourages-lossy-yalla-group-limited-investors-to-obtain-legal-counsel-before-important-securities-class-action-deadline/#respond Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:15:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-national-trial-lawyers-encourages-lossy-yalla-group-limited-investors-to-obtain-legal-counsel-before-important-securities-class-action-deadline/ New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – August 22, 2021) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of buyers of securities of Yalla Group Limited (NYSE: YALA) between September 30, 2020 and August 9, 2021 inclusive (the “Class Period”). A […]]]>

New York, New York – (Newsfile Corp. – August 22, 2021) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of buyers of securities of Yalla Group Limited (NYSE: YALA) between September 30, 2020 and August 9, 2021 inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action has already been filed. If you want to serve as the principal applicant, you must move the court no later than October 12, 2021.

SO WHAT: If you purchased securities of Yalla during the Class Period, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any costs or direct charges under a contingency fee agreement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Yalla class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1987.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class action has already been filed. If you want to serve as the principal applicant, you must move the court no later than October 12, 2021. A principal plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of the other members of the class to direct the litigation.

WHY THE ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified advisors with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, companies issuing reviews do not have significant experience, resources or recognition by their peers. Be wise in choosing the right lawyer. Rosen law firm represents investors around the world, focusing its practice on class actions in securities and derivative litigation between shareholders. Rosen law firm has secured the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. Rosen law firm was ranked # 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 every year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone, the company raised more than $ 438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was appointed by law360 as the Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s lawyers have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

CASE DETAILS: According to the lawsuit, the defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and financial actions. Specifically, the Defendants made false and / or misleading statements regarding, and / or failed to disclose, that the Company overestimated its user metrics and revenues and, therefore, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On May 19, 2021, Swan Street Research (“Swan Street”) published a report (the “Swan Street Report”) directed to Yalla entitled “Is Yalla Group a Multi $ B Fraud? The ‘Clubhouse of the Middle East ‘UAE Tech Unicorn who never was. ” The Swan Street report alleged, among other things, that the company had inflated its financial metrics, including user data and revenues, and called Yalla’s financial statements “not credible.” Following this news, Yalla’s stock price fell $ 1.31 per share, or 7.15%, to close at $ 17.01 per share on May 19, 2021.

The next day, May 20, 2021, analyst The Bear Cave released a report titled “Problems of the Yalla Group[.]“Following this news, Yalla’s stock price fell a further 6% on May 20 to close at $ 15.96.

Then, on August 9, 2021, after markets closed, Yalla issued a press release titled “Yalla Group Limited Announces Unaudited Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results”, announcing its financial results for the second quarter of 2021 (“Results of 2Q21 “). 2Q21 results revealed that Yalla had quarterly revenue of $ 66.62 million, which fell short of analysts’ expectations. On this news, Yalla’s stock price fell 18% on August 10, 2021, closing at $ 10.99, down from its previous closing price of $ 13.55.

To join the Yalla class action lawsuit, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1987.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or by emailing pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

No class has been certified. Until a group is certified, you are not represented by a lawyer unless you hire one. You can choose the lawyer of your choice. You can also remain an absent group member and do nothing at this point. The ability of an investor to participate in any potential future recovery does not depend on whether he or she is a lead applicant.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Lawyer advertising. Previous results do not guarantee a similar result.

——————————-

Contact details:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Rosen Law Firm, Pennsylvania
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone. : (212) 686-1060
Toll free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cas@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/93895



Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/rosen-national-trial-lawyers-encourages-lossy-yalla-group-limited-investors-to-obtain-legal-counsel-before-important-securities-class-action-deadline/feed/ 0
Remote work can now last two years, worrying some bosses https://treyrileylaw.com/remote-work-can-now-last-two-years-worrying-some-bosses/ https://treyrileylaw.com/remote-work-can-now-last-two-years-worrying-some-bosses/#respond Sun, 22 Aug 2021 09:30:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/remote-work-can-now-last-two-years-worrying-some-bosses/ With the latest wave of back-to-office delays from Covid-19, some companies are considering a new possibility: offices could be closed for nearly two years. This makes executives fear that the longer people stay at home, the more difficult or disruptive it might be to get them back eventually. Many employees developed new routines during the […]]]>

With the latest wave of back-to-office delays from Covid-19, some companies are considering a new possibility: offices could be closed for nearly two years.

This makes executives fear that the longer people stay at home, the more difficult or disruptive it might be to get them back eventually.

Many employees developed new routines during the pandemic, trading commuting for exercise or blocking hours for non-stop work. Even staff members who once bristled at doing their jobs outside of an office have come to embrace the flexibility and productivity of home living over the past 18 months, many say. Surveys have shown that enthusiasm for remote working has only increased as the pandemic spreads.

“If you have a little problem, people go back to the old way. Well, that’s not a blip, ”said Pat Gelsinger, CEO of Intel Corp., whose company has benefited from the work-from-home boom. He predicts that hybrid and remote working will remain the norm for months and years to come. “There is no going back.”

Return dates have been postponed several times. Apple Inc. told company employees on Thursday that its planned return to its U.S. offices would be delayed until at least January. Companies such as Chevron Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. postponed returns from September, while tech companies such as Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook Inc. pushed them back to early next year. Lyft Inc. said it would recall employees at its San Francisco headquarters in February, about 23 months after the rideshare company closed its offices.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/remote-work-can-now-last-two-years-worrying-some-bosses/feed/ 0
Biometrics: meeting ethical and legal challenges https://treyrileylaw.com/biometrics-meeting-ethical-and-legal-challenges/ https://treyrileylaw.com/biometrics-meeting-ethical-and-legal-challenges/#respond Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:30:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/biometrics-meeting-ethical-and-legal-challenges/ Biometrics is a growing field – these technologies are increasingly used to identify people in a range of contexts and scenarios, including in criminal justice and travel. The COVID19 crises have exacerbated this trend. Speaking at a recent Westminster electronic forum policy conference on this topic, Isabelle Moeller, CEO of the Biometrics Institute, explained: “During […]]]>

Biometrics is a growing field – these technologies are increasingly used to identify people in a range of contexts and scenarios, including in criminal justice and travel. The COVID19 crises have exacerbated this trend. Speaking at a recent Westminster electronic forum policy conference on this topic, Isabelle Moeller, CEO of the Biometrics Institute, explained: “During the pandemic, it has become clear that contactless interaction is a priority. . We have also seen an increase in remote integration, not only for government, but also for banks and businesses everywhere. “

However, as its use increases, so do ethical and legal concerns. This includes data protection – regarding highly personal information collected and stored and the potential for technologies such as facial recognition to be negatively biased against minority groups.

Implementation of biometrics

During the electronic forum, Moeller highlighted the important benefits offered by biometrics for “national security, both in the prevention and investigation of terrorism, and in border management, anti-fraud and facilitation. of digital identity ”.

She believes that organizations can mitigate ethical issues related to biometrics by following “best practice” policies when implementing these technologies. These should revolve around the “three laws of biometrics” advocated by the Biometrics Institute, which are “politics must come first, followed by process and then technology”. The policy stage must analyze potential issues such as proportionate use and human rights, while the process puts in place safeguards to ensure that they are protected when the technology is used. “Only then do you really have to think about the technology,” she added.

According to Moeller, organizations often rush to implement biometric solutions without asking questions about them. “Then biometrics are blamed when in reality it was probably a lack of policy or process,” she said.

She also noted that many biometric technologies are unbiased regarding demographic differences such as gender and race and are “normally very efficient and accurate in individual verification mode”.

The key to making sure these types of problems do not occur is to “understand the technology”, especially the algorithm used. Additionally, it is always important for organizations to consider whether biometric technology is proportionate and whether there is a viable alternative before embarking on this path.

Its underlying message was that organizations considering introducing biometrics must have a comprehensive strategy and process to do so, especially when there is currently a lack of regulations and standards in this area.

Update of legislation and standards

Jessica Figueras, Vice President of the UK Cyber ​​Security Council, then gave a presentation on biometric regulation in the UK and how this area needs to evolve. As it stands, there is only protection for the use of fingerprints and DNA in the UK, which means the regulations urgently need to be updated. It is “a classic case of technology exceeding the capacity of society to keep pace.”

She described legislation introduced by the decentralized Scottish government last year which establishes a Scottish Biometrics Commissioner, who “shows the way forward”. This is mainly due to the fact that this Commissioner covers a much more comprehensive range of biometric technologies than in the UK, such as gait analysis, voice analysis and facial expressions. However, Figueras noted that the field of biometrics is evolving so rapidly that even this legislation does not cover very recent developments in areas such as keystroke recognition.

Another aspect of this legislation is that “it very explicitly considers the impact on equality and vulnerable citizens and also requires that commissioners work with a wide range of public bodies and that the citizens’ voices of stakeholders / users be integrated into the process, ”Figueras said.

She therefore hopes that the UK government will follow the path taken by the Scottish administration, especially as the use of biometrics in the private sector “raises pressing questions”. Among private players, they often use these technologies in public spaces, such as shopping malls and venues, as well as user ID for online services.

Introducing such practices and regulations is only one side of the equation, according to Figueras. The practical challenge of ensuring the implementation of these rules is significant and requires “very specialized skills” which “are incredibly scarce and very expensive”. This includes areas such as algorithmic inspection.

This lack of qualified surveillance services may have the effect of slowing “the rate of development of biometric technology and will give society a chance to keep pace.”

Privacy design and algorithmic bias

In the final section of the session, Philip James, partner, global privacy and cybersecurity group at law firm Eversheds Sutherland, discussed the legal issues surrounding algorithms and biometric data. He said organizations need to be very aware of these issues as the public is increasingly aware of the use of biometrics and algorithms – the benefits and the risks.

In terms of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which the UK has incorporated into its laws since Brexit, all biometric data is generally considered ‘special category data’. It is essentially information “which is controlled more strictly because it has a greater sensitivity”. This means that organizations will have to make the case that data should not be categorized in this way. “The goal and the context are always key,” commented James.

He stressed that organizations should carefully follow the conditions set out in Article 9 of the GDPR (processing of special categories of personal data) to ensure that they remain compliant when collecting biometric data. He cited an opinion published by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) on a case in which police used facial recognition technologies to identify potential criminals in a crowd. These actions were deemed to be illegal because the police did not follow the correct processes regarding this type of data. Unless there are exceptions, such as the detection and prevention of an illegal act, in most situations the processing of biometric data requires “explicit consent” from the data subjects.

James also advised organizations using biometric technologies to have a data protection officer to ensure that data in that particular category is handled properly, and to involve business and legal parties from the start “because this will ensure the best outcome to hopefully mitigate risk and ensure the investment is well targeted.

Biometrics offers many benefits to society, and these technologies will only increase in the years to come. However, organizations must implement these technologies in a prudent and controlled manner, ensuring that they do not fall prey to ethical and legal issues.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/biometrics-meeting-ethical-and-legal-challenges/feed/ 0
In practice: how Shell maximizes the value of its legal operations function https://treyrileylaw.com/in-practice-how-shell-maximizes-the-value-of-its-legal-operations-function/ https://treyrileylaw.com/in-practice-how-shell-maximizes-the-value-of-its-legal-operations-function/#respond Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:17:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/in-practice-how-shell-maximizes-the-value-of-its-legal-operations-function/ The Royal Dutch Shell logo can be seen at a Shell petrol station in London on January 31, 2008. REUTERS / Toby Melville / File Photo Donny Ching is the visionary leader of Shell’s global legal department, which has a total of 1,000 professionals in 45 countries. Under Ching, Shell’s legal department moved from a […]]]>

The Royal Dutch Shell logo can be seen at a Shell petrol station in London on January 31, 2008. REUTERS / Toby Melville / File Photo

Donny Ching is the visionary leader of Shell’s global legal department, which has a total of 1,000 professionals in 45 countries. Under Ching, Shell’s legal department moved from a responsive, labor-intensive, lawyer-centric model that simply offered legal advice to a proactive, data-driven, technology-driven model. and multidisciplinary offering a range of valuable business solutions. .

The transformation was fueled by Ching and her ability to enable her legal operations team to fully maximize the value she brings to the legal department and, by extension, the business as a whole. In our last interview, Ching discusses his approach, providing examples that demonstrate the benefits of expanding the role of legal operations.

Rose Gold: What was your objective in starting a legal operations cell and how is it organized?

Donny Ching: We launched our legal operations function in 2018 to reduce costs, increase efficiency and consolidate services. Today our team of project managers, pricing specialists, data analysts, technologists and digital design specialists work in two of Shell’s offshore service centers in Malaysia and Poland. The service centers are also home to our team of legal advisers, made up of junior lawyers and paralegals, who currently focus on standardized, low-risk work. Our Chief Legal Officer, Barry Tyndall, leads the team, reports to me and is part of my legal leadership team.

Rose Gold: I imagine having a group with such diverse skills and mindsets helps spur innovation.

Donny Ching: We strive to create a culture where bold and creative thinking is encouraged and nurtured. One way to develop a culture of innovation is to bring together talented people with diverse backgrounds and skills to rethink the work to be done and by what means. I challenge my team to be “outside the box” thinkers.

For more information, see

In my experience, this requires having a box that includes more than lawyers. I constantly assess the new skills and disciplines that we need to innovate and continuously improve.

Rose Gold: How far have you gone off the beaten track?

Donny Ching: One of our most interesting experiences is what we call visual contracts. We explore how to add visual elements – sketches, graphics, images – in contracts where technical concepts or other complex concepts are difficult to understand using only words. We have found that adding visual elements results in shorter, clearer chords.

The results of this experience have made us think about how we can make all our contracts understandable for the parties who will perform them. Many contracts are written in legal jargon with long “what if” clauses that most agreement signatories have difficulty understanding; they only sign because each party trusts their lawyers. We want to go back to the original objective of a contract: a meeting of minds.

Rose Gold: Why is the legal advisory team part of the legal operations function?

Donny Ching: Having the advisory team within legal operations allows us to begin consolidating in our service centers work that does not require a lawyer to be in a specific onshore jurisdiction. Consolidating this work will help us “get it right” and work more efficiently. We started by asking our service center lawyers to take on some low risk standardized jobs and are now developing their skills and knowledge to handle more complex jobs.

Rose Gold: What is an example of work that has been transferred to service centers?

Donny Ching: We had hundreds of lawyers, some very experienced, who wrote thousands of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) a year. Today, we are migrating to an easy-to-use technological tool that will allow most of our NDAs to be quickly generated by our co-workers. If an NDA is more complicated or unique, the technical tool allows the client to send the NDA to the legal advisory team who draft the NDA or send it to a lawyer with the necessary expertise in the matter.

Rose Gold: So, consolidating NDAs also helped you automate them.

Donny Ching: Exactly. Achieving the digital transformation we want will require standardizing as much work as possible. Centralization of work facilitates standardization. It also helps us to simplify the process and make it more efficient because you don’t really want to digitize your inefficiencies.

Donny Ching, Head of Global Legal, Shell

Rose Gold: What changes have legal operations made to the way you use data?

Donny Ching: We have increased the efficiency with which we use data and improved the metrics we use to measure performance.

We used to house data on all of our patents – in the thousands in total – in reams of spreadsheets that took days to review. Extracting information was extremely time consuming. Today, our patents are accessible through an easy-to-use visual dashboard with powerful search capabilities. But the dashboard does more than quickly access data – it allows us to query the data. For example, the tool now allows us to rank different patents in terms of importance and value, all related to the underlying agreements so that we can drill down to an individual license agreement to see what the license revenue is, when it expires, etc.

Among the metrics we use to measure the performance of law firms is the value we realize in what we call “appropriate fee arrangements”. We assess whether we have achieved the expected cost savings and monitor the added value we have received in the form of training, secondments or free hotlines.

Rose Gold: Visual contracts, self-service NDAs, and patent data at your fingertips all point to an intentional assessment of the work to be done and by what does mean . What’s next, Donny?

Donny Ching: Then the launch of a single service platform – a 24/7 digital gateway called LegalConnect – where everything except bespoke and strategic work will be connected, assigned and managed. . Having such a central clearinghouse would allow us to become more strategic and proactive. We could quantify the volume and type of work and know which companies and which countries mobilize the most work. Knowing all of this would help us identify potential exposures faster and develop ways to manage them.

Such comprehensive data would also help us manage the legal department. We could better allocate resources between companies and countries and better assess the levels of experience we need among our lawyers.

The opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the principles of trust, is committed to respecting integrity, independence and freedom from bias. Thomson Reuters Institute is owned by Thomson Reuters and operates independently of Reuters News.

Rose Gold

Rose is a storyteller whose work celebrates people, ideas and movements. Every story she tells is designed to inform, influence and inspire her audience – the people who read her articles and interviews, listen to her speak, and, in the fall, attend her online classes. Rose’s columns – Upfront & Personal, Curious Minds and On Leadership – appear monthly on the Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute blog. She is a member of the Berkeley Law Executive Education Program, where she writes the Voices in Sustainability column for the Business in Society Institute. Rose also writes in-depth articles for the school’s Women in Business Law initiative on topics ranging from well-being in the legal sector to gender parity and breaking the glass ceiling. Rose is a study on the power of creative reinvention. Since graduating from Berkeley Law School in 1983, she has practiced law, led sales efforts at a large law firm, launched two successful businesses inside and outside the industry. legal and has served on several not-for-profit boards.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/in-practice-how-shell-maximizes-the-value-of-its-legal-operations-function/feed/ 0
BOARD MEMBER PROFILE: Zekiah N. Wright https://treyrileylaw.com/board-member-profile-zekiah-n-wright/ https://treyrileylaw.com/board-member-profile-zekiah-n-wright/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 05:57:57 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/board-member-profile-zekiah-n-wright/ Zekiah Wright is a pioneering lawyer representing LGBTQ workers who have experienced unfair discrimination from their employers. They are also co-chairs of the West Hollywood Lesbian and Gay Advisory Council. Wright spoke with WEHOville about their coming out story, what brought them to California, and their personal feelings about some of the biggest issues the […]]]>

Zekiah Wright is a pioneering lawyer representing LGBTQ workers who have experienced unfair discrimination from their employers. They are also co-chairs of the West Hollywood Lesbian and Gay Advisory Council. Wright spoke with WEHOville about their coming out story, what brought them to California, and their personal feelings about some of the biggest issues the LGBTQ community faces on WeHo.

Tell us the story of Zekiah – where did it all start?

I grew up in Winter Haven, which is a small town between Tampa and Orlando (Florida). And then I went to undergrad at Stetson. And then I went to law school at Florida A&M which is in Orlando, so I spent quite a few years in Orlando working and studying law. I moved to California in 2017 and started my own law firm. The motivation behind this was that the old company I worked in sort of gave me all LGBTQ employees that we represented and I think the employees have always been very grateful for that. They felt like we could connect on a different level, and I just thought about why I wouldn’t start a company whose goal is to represent identified LGBTQ employees. And that’s kind of how I ended up here.

What was your experience growing up in Florida?

I knew by the time I got to law school I was sure I wanted to go, I just hadn’t identified where. I mean, this is the south, right? So all kinds of typical things that are associated with the South were quite prevalent there.

When did you go out?

I got out when I was in college so I mean maybe 12, 13, 14 somewhere around that time.

And you are now…?

I m 35 years old.

What was it like going out to college in Florida and the South at the time?

I don’t even think I had the language of coming out. My mom found out, and I was like yeah, that’s kind of what I like – I like girls, you know? It was hard. My family is Southern Baptist and so I think for a few years it was kind of ‘just don’t talk about it’, right? It was sort of my family’s approach. And then when I was 20 and was seriously dating someone, I would take them to different vacation functions and it kind of became known and people felt comfortable with it. , and now my mom loves my current girlfriend. She’s getting more and more familiar with the language and we’re having conversations about it so it’s very different now. But I think at first it was kind of like “pray for it and you’ll be healed.”

Do you mind sharing how she found out you were gay?

My older brother overheard a conversation between me and my girlfriend at that point, just talking about our relationship and interaction, and I had no idea he was listening. so when i opened the door i was like, “hey, what are you doing here? And his face was fuming, and he was like, ‘I’m telling mom’ and that’s what she found out.

How did you meet your girlfriend at the time?

She was my best friend at the time. I was doing a school project at a classmate’s house and she just randomly kissed me and I was just like ‘OK’, and to her I think she was kind of joking, and to me that meant something. something bigger. So I remember being so confused the rest of the time we were there, then I called my best friend. I was like ‘so and so kissed me’ and I really liked that and she was just like ‘Oh!’ and it kind of opened up where she was like, ‘Well, I’m curious too.’ And then it was sort of my first girlfriend who was originally my best friend at the time.

What made you want to study law?

I think my first memory was watching a politician on TV and telling him that he was a lawyer and that he spoke about any subject at the time. I’m pretty sure I was 7 or 8 and remember that for a school project we had to write what we wanted to be. I wrote that I wanted to be a lawyer and I was 8 or 9 years old at the time. In my mind, I just associated being able to do good with being a lawyer, and I was like “I want to do this.”

Did you plan to work on behalf of LGBTQ causes?

It wasn’t until I was working in the DC firm that this sort of thing became what I wanted to focus on. I think after law school I was like “I don’t know what I want to do”. I looked at all of these different areas and thought to myself “No, I don’t like any of them.” And the firm I started working for was dealing with employment law on the plaintiff side and it also dealt with other areas that I really enjoyed doing. And then that’s where it kind of fell into place in my mind. And in my law school, there was no LGBTQ bar association, which is crazy because there were so many bar associations for all other interests. There was like animal rights, black students, constitutional law, but there was no LGBTQ. So me and a few other law students actually created the first LGBTQ bar association in my law school and I was its founding president. I think this maybe planted a seed, but I wasn’t quite sure what I wanted to do or how I wanted to bring my personal interests and experiences to what I was doing professionally.

How did California come into play?

I wanted to get my law school degree early so I found this program at Pepperdine where you could just go during the winter months and get some extra credit so you can graduate earlier. And so I came to Pepperdine and absolutely fell in love with it. By the time I got off the plane my then-fiancée was with me, and we went to rent a car and got ready to explain that we both wanted to be on the car rental, we were partners , we were a woman – like all that. And we walked in and we said to the guy, and he was like ‘OK cool’ and there were no more questions about it. If it was Florida, we would still be there trying to explain to her how we were partners, so it was like my first experience. Then we walked around Santa Monica and we were holding hands and nobody cared and it just wasn’t my experience in Florida. In Florida, it was just better not to do it, because you didn’t want to attract attention, and so here I was like nobody cared, and I think that’s what has. sealed the deal for me. When I signed up to the California bar people thought I was crazy. They were like, “You didn’t go to law school in California, it’s the toughest bar in the country, why are you doing that?” and I was like, ‘I have to live there.’ And I took the bar and passed the first time.

Board member John D’Amico appointed you to the Lesbian and Gay Advisory Council. What ideas did you give him at the start?

I think I was really interested in seeing more people of color represented in the city, in terms of companies, boards and commissions, and having our interests taken into account more. I know my friends and I, we were always coming to West Hollywood but we didn’t see a lot of us represented in ownership or even a lot of patronage, depending on which bar you are in. So I was like, “We’re here, we’re spending the money, some people live here, but I don’t think there’s any particular interest in keeping us here, OR in meeting the needs that we have that. are different from other bands. So I told him about it, and he said, “Yeah, okay, let’s see what you can do.”

What do you think have been your greatest accomplishments on the board so far?

I’ll call it a pre-fulfillment. So right before COVID happened, my idea was for us to have a panel with all the women of color who were more masculine and who were sort of discussing, especially in the workplace, our needs, their differences, of how we want to be approached, respected, how to have these conversations with our colleagues. The ideal demographic would have been employers and just people who work in professional environments to come and listen to this panel. I wanted to go to one of the local restaurants or bars and have some kind of meet and greet where we could really exchange information and serve as a kind of support system for ourselves and for the people who want to support us . And so we’ll see once the restrictions are lifted for in-person urban activities, how we can achieve that. it’s one of the things I’m really excited to do.

What do you think of gender neutral bathrooms in WeHo?

I think the city has the right idea. I don’t understand how people find this so problematic. For me, it’s almost obvious. Of course, gender neutral bathrooms. We do not care? We all piss side by side anyway. We’re not here hanging around for hours. It seems like such a non-issue to me and I know it’s been such a huge issue obviously across the country, but more particularly in West Hollywood. I was really surprised by all the backlash and the community members who really oppose it. I just think we should move on. It doesn’t change the experience of people in the bathroom.

What about the controversy over the repainting of pedestrian crossings in the colors of the flag of progress?

So LGAB, I think we voted unanimously for the progressive flag to replace the rainbow flag and I strongly support it. I mean, if we stay true to the progressive cities mantra and the city also does things to help tackle things like racial injustice, for me it’s only natural that we are inclusive in this way so that people feel thoughtful and somewhat protected. It’s a small gesture that uplifts black and brown communities and trans communities. I think this is another obvious fact. But I know that it was not so easy for some boards to make the decision to make the progressive flag the flag of the crosswalk.

Would you like to support a general update of all West Hollywood rainbow flags with the colors of the Progress Flag?

Yeah I think so. We are a city where others come together, so why not celebrate each other?


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/board-member-profile-zekiah-n-wright/feed/ 0
After a year and a half, Jenner’s ex-president says Willkie’s Chicago ambitions are paying off https://treyrileylaw.com/after-a-year-and-a-half-jenners-ex-president-says-willkies-chicago-ambitions-are-paying-off/ https://treyrileylaw.com/after-a-year-and-a-half-jenners-ex-president-says-willkies-chicago-ambitions-are-paying-off/#respond Fri, 06 Aug 2021 20:20:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/after-a-year-and-a-half-jenners-ex-president-says-willkies-chicago-ambitions-are-paying-off/ The offices of Willkie Farr & Gallagher in New York. REUTERS / Andrew Kelly The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this functionality as we continue to test and develop in beta. We appreciate comments, which you can provide using the […]]]>

The offices of Willkie Farr & Gallagher in New York. REUTERS / Andrew Kelly

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this functionality as we continue to test and develop in beta. We appreciate comments, which you can provide using the comments tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) – New York’s Willkie Farr & Gallagher burst into Chicago last March, adding six prominent Jenner & Block partners, including Craig Martin, then president of the Chicago-based company.

More than 16 months later, Willkie’s Chicago office has more than 45 lawyers, a number Martin said he expects growth.

“We haven’t lost anyone,” said Martin, president of the company in the Midwest. “And I don’t think we made an offer to an associate who didn’t come.”

Martin spoke with Reuters this week about Willkie’s strategy for success in Chicago’s increasingly crowded legal market, the challenge of getting started during a pandemic, and how the company is coping with a resurgence of cases of virus.

While many of his Big Law counterparts question whether to postpone plans to return to the office in the coming weeks, Martin said Willkie has already decided not to ask any of his employees to return to the office until. ‘see you next year.

The conversation below has been edited for clarity and brevity.

REUTERS: Willkie Farr arrived in Chicago in late March at the start of the pandemic. It seems like a tricky or inopportune time to get started in a new city.

CRAIG MARTIN: It’s true that we opened on March 31, 2020. And it’s just as true that by then COVID had essentially closed many states and cities, including Chicago. With perfect 20/20 hindsight, we actually found it to be a blessing, and here’s what I mean by that: Our practice during the COVID period was as robust and intense as it always has been. . And if anything, the COVID period has made it more intense when it comes to crisis management for customers, immediately dealing with the myriad of business, employment and other issues that arose during the COVID crisis. So our practice didn’t miss a beat. In fact, it has increased quite substantially as our clients have started deploying us on more corporate and transactional assignments, asset management assignments and things that Willkie is well known for in private equity and private equity. Mergers and Acquisitions. A good time for us, even if you wouldn’t have expected it to be a good time.

Craig Martin. Photo courtesy of Willkie, Farr & Gallagher

REUTERS: How would you describe the state of the Chicago legal market?

MARTIN: From our perspective, there is a leak from customers. There is a talent drain and a quality flight that takes place in the Chicago legal market and in domestic and international legal markets. We therefore see that the demand for our litigation and litigation practice is increasing. The demand for our private wealth management practice that we see is increasing because there is a quality flight going on.

REUTERS: Several other companies have all flocked to Chicago in the past year. Coupled with the companies already present, are you worried that the Chicago market will become saturated?

MARTIN: I don’t think the market in the area we’re competing in is saturated at all. The types of business we do and the types of clients we work for are the country’s largest businesses and wealthy families, and we represent them in their most important economic and reputational affairs. When it comes to this practice, we are very competitive.

The legal market is very diverse. Companies play in all kinds of different spaces in the legal market. It’s no surprise to me that other companies are opening offices here. For our part, we attract the best talent from the legal community as people learn more about the Willkie Chicago team. So that’s what I see happening. I think there is a lot of room for top legal talent and firms that attract legal talent like this to the Chicago market.

REUTERS: Where is the company in terms of masking and vaccinations?

MARTIN: We haven’t announced anything about it. The only announcement we have made is that no one will be forced to return to the office until 2022. These are not issues that we have faced. I have read all the press you have read, so follow it with great interest. We are very tuned in to science, the CDC and so on. But we haven’t, other than saying no one will be forced to come back until 2022, we haven’t done anything yet.

Read more:

White-shoe law firms are shy about the reopening of offices

AT A GLANCE: Willkie opens Chicago office with ex-president of Jenner & Block

David thomas

David Thomas reports on legal affairs including law firm strategy, hiring, mergers and litigation. He is based in Chicago. He can be reached at d.thomas@thomsonreuters.com and on Twitter @ DaveThomas5150.


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/after-a-year-and-a-half-jenners-ex-president-says-willkies-chicago-ambitions-are-paying-off/feed/ 0
2nd Circ. Told to throw the law firm’s RICO appeal https://treyrileylaw.com/2nd-circ-told-to-throw-the-law-firms-rico-appeal/ https://treyrileylaw.com/2nd-circ-told-to-throw-the-law-firms-rico-appeal/#respond Thu, 05 Aug 2021 23:30:00 +0000 https://treyrileylaw.com/2nd-circ-told-to-throw-the-law-firms-rico-appeal/ Law360 (Aug 5, 2021, 7:30 p.m. EDT) – Several of the 50 or so healthcare companies that a New York law firm has accused of implementing a check cashing program on its behalf have asked the Second Circuit to dismiss a dismissal appeal, claiming the company had not been racketeering. The companies, which include an […]]]>
Law360 (Aug 5, 2021, 7:30 p.m. EDT) – Several of the 50 or so healthcare companies that a New York law firm has accused of implementing a check cashing program on its behalf have asked the Second Circuit to dismiss a dismissal appeal, claiming the company had not been racketeering.

The companies, which include an acupuncture practice, a rehabilitation center and a chiropractor, said in their opening briefs this week that they were accused of cashing only one, two or three checks at the order of Petroff Amshen LLP, which is not sufficient to show a “pattern of racketeering activity” under the Organizations Influenced by Racketeers and Corrupt Organizations Act.

In his costume, Petroff …

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of prosecution, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, requests, etc.
  • Create personalized alerts for specific case articles and topics and more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS


Source link

]]>
https://treyrileylaw.com/2nd-circ-told-to-throw-the-law-firms-rico-appeal/feed/ 0